|
 |
|
Environmental Litigation
McRoberts & Roberts represents clients in complex environmental, cost recovery and environmental insurance litigation in all federal and state courts, as well as in administrative proceedings, arbitration and mediation.
A. Cost Recovery and Remediation Actions
McRoberts & Roberts has successfully pursued parties responsible for releases of hazardous materials and/or petroleum contamination on our clients’ properties to recover response costs, diminution in property value and other damages. We have forced responsible parties to perform millions of dollars worth of response actions to clean up releases of contaminants, to bring in public drinking water supplies, to provide indemnification against third party liability, and in several instances to purchase at fair market value properties that they have contaminated. McRoberts & Roberts has additionally recovered millions of dollars in damages for diminution in value and loss of use and enjoyment of contaminated properties.
B. Environmental Insurance Coverage Litigation
McRoberts & Roberts has obtained millions of dollars of insurance coverage for releases or suspected releases of Oil and Hazardous Materials at commercial, industrial and residential sites. We have been able to secure coverage from our clients’ historic liability policies, homeowners policies and also from responsible parties’ liability policies. McRoberts & Roberts has successfully prosecuted actions for bad faith refusals to provide coverage for environmental claims, obtaining recovery of attorneys fees and multiple damages for our clients. We utilize sophisticated forensic techniques to demonstrate that releases of Oil and Hazardous Materials are covered by available insurance policies.
C. Civil and Criminal Environmental Defense
McRoberts & Roberts represents clients that are targets of state, federal and local enforcement, penalty, and cost recovery proceedings. These proceedings include cost recovery actions brought pursuant to CERCLA (Superfund), RCRA, M.G.L. c.21E and common law. In the cost recovery actions brought in connection with the Charles George Landfill Superfund Site, the Schaffer Landfill Superfund Site, and the Beede Waste Oil Superfund Site, McRoberts & Roberts successfully served as liaison counsel on behalf of groups of corporate defendants in negotiations with the federal and state governments and other defendants. Additionally, McRoberts & Roberts has successfully defended actions brought by the Massachusetts Environmental Strike Force, Army Corps of Engineers, OSHA and the Massachusetts Water Resource Association. An important part of many defense actions has been McRoberts & Roberts’s ability to identify and successfully prosecute additional responsible parties and to obtain defense and indemnity coverage from our clients’ insurance companies and from state reimbursement funds. Additionally, McRoberts & Roberts has been able to creatively use our specialized knowledge of remedial technologies to implement environmentally sound solutions while concurrently reducing our clients’ costs by strategic utilization of activity and use limitations and Brownfields redevelopment.
D. Negotiation, Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Where appropriate, McRoberts & Roberts aggressively pursues negotiation, mediation and alternative dispute resolution before and during litigation in order to minimize litigation costs to its clients. The pre-suit procedure established by M.G.L. c. 21E, 4A has enabled McRoberts & Roberts to resolve many cost recovery actions through mediation, obviating the necessity for prolonged and expensive litigation.
For more detailed information, please contact us or read more about our practice below:
- Mark W. Roberts
- mroberts@mcrobertslaw.com
-
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Representative Clients
Alliance Energy Corp.
Boston & Maine Railroad Corporation
Broadie Mountain Ski Area, Inc.
Bursaw Oil Corporation
Congress Technical Spray Company, Inc.
Country Club of Pittsfield
Cumberland Farms, Inc.
Danvers Savings Bank
Detroit Diesel-Alison, Inc.
Everest Partners, LLC
Federal Metal Finishing, Inc.
The Flatley Company
Gasoline Merchants, Inc Global Petroleum Corp.
Glover Estates, LLC
Guilford Transportation Corporation
Liberty Chevrolet, Inc.
Metro International, Inc.
Mohawk Metals Corp.
New England Detroit Diesel-Allison, Inc.
Oyster Technologies, Inc.
Standard Chain Company
Tech-Etch, Inc.
Town of Boxford, Massachusetts
Town of Lincoln, Massachusetts
Town of Mansfield, Massachusetts
Case Studies
Beede Waste Oil Super Fund Site
The United States of America has sent Requests for Information pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) in connection with the Beede Waste Oil Site in Plaistow, New Hampshire as the first step in a cost recovery action. The Beede Waste Oil Site is a 39-acre site contaminated with oil and hazardous materials that is surrounded primarily by residential properties. Additionally, groundwater contamination is migrating from the Site. McRoberts & Roberts is counseling its clients concerning the responses to the Requests for Information and will be representing these clients in all aspects of this litigation.
Shaffer Landfill Operable Unit of the Iron Horse Park Superfund Site
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
The United States of America sent Notices of Potential Responsibility to approximately 65 parties pursuant to CERCLA in connection with the Shaffer Landfill Operable Unit of the Iron Horse Park Superfund Site. The United States asserted claims against the defendants to recover $14,000,000 in response costs, as well as asserting natural resource damages claims. McRoberts & Roberts has successfully negotiated with Department of Justice attorneys and with attorneys for the major PRPs concerning allocation and ability-to-pay issues.
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
A&P Realty v. Metropolitan District Commission
Massachusetts Superior Court
McRoberts & Roberts represented a commercial property owner whose property had been impacted by a 90,000 gallon oil release. We oversaw a comprehensive environmental investigation of our client’s property and adjoining properties, and then brought suit seeking damages for diminution in property value and recovery of remediation costs. At trial, we obtained a substantial verdict to cover our client’s costs of remediation.
Charles George Landfill Superfund Site
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Mark Roberts represented companies, including an eight company liaison group, in a complex, 60-party case brought by the United States under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, seeking recovery of the costs of remediating a contaminated landfill in Tyngsboro, Massachusetts. The case involved over two years of intensive motion practice, extensive fact and expert discovery, and protracted multiparty negotiations and mediation, ultimately resulting in the entry of a judicial consent decree.
Major Oil Company v. Zurich Insurance Company
After a major release of gasoline at an historic oil terminal, our client sought insurance coverage for cleanup costs. The insurer, Zurich Insurance Company, agreed to pay only 5% of cleanup costs asserting that the remaining 95% of costs were related to historic contamination. McRoberts & Roberts coordinated a team of environmental and forensic experts to distinguish historic releases and quantify costs related to the gasoline release. We then sent a pre-suit bad faith demand to Zurich with a comprehensive environmental forensics report and demand for mediation prior to the institution of litigation. As a result of the ensuing mediation, our client obtained coverage for in excess of $1 million in cleanup costs.
Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. George Hinrichs, et als.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Our client, Cumberland Farms, Inc. (CFI), owned a property located in Orleans, Massachusetts where solvent contamination was discovered in the groundwater. McRoberts & Roberts oversaw the investigation of the property during which it was determined that the contamination was migrating from an upgradient source. McRoberts & Roberts oversaw the filing of a downgradient property status pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan. Thereafter, we brought a cost recovery action against three responsible parties for recovery of all response costs incurred, diminution in value of the property, and to force additional assessment and remediation required at the property. As a result of these efforts, our client obtained payment for all property damage and indemnification for all future response costs.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. (Name Withheld)
Massachusetts Superior Court
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts alleged that our client had intentionally bypassed the water purification system at his metal plating company and dumped water containing hazardous substances into the sewer system in violation of the existing wastewater discharge permit. The Commonwealth brought both an administrative and criminal complaint against the client, seeking fines and incarceration. The case was settled at trial after complex negotiations resulted in a considerable reduction in penalties without incarceration and the renewal of the company’s wastewater discharge permits.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. (Name Withheld)
The Environmental Strike Force closed down our client’s gravel operations, claiming that the client had illegally received solid and hazardous waste in the gravel pit. The Strike Force ordered immediate removal of more than 600 truckloads of materials. The removal costs were anticipated to exceed $400,000 and the client also faced substantial civil and criminal penalties. By aggressively managing the situation, including developing a testing protocol to establish that no hazardous materials had been illegally disposed at the gravel pit, the client was able to dispose of the subject materials over a period of months in a landfill at no charge as daily cover. No criminal charges were brought and the client received a substantial reduction in civil penalties.
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
New England: Gasoline Contamination Discovered Upon Tenant’s Removal of Underground Tanks
Gasoline contamination was discovered in a service station on a mall pad site at the end of a major oil company’s lease. The major oil company performed only the minimum investigation required by state environmental regulators. McRoberts & Roberts was retained to expedite cleanup to render property marketable. Pre-suit mechanisms to prompt a quicker cleanup of the property were utilized but the major oil company refused to participate. Environmental contractors competitively bid and the mall owner took over the cleanup. The extent of the pollution was delineated and the source removed within four months of assuming responsibility for cleanup. Environmental insurance was obtained to cover the risk of migration off-site. McRoberts & Roberts then brought a cost recovery action for cleanup costs, economic losses and expert and attorneys fees, which was successfully mediated immediately before trial.
Southeastern United States: Solvent Contamination Discovered During Pre-Acquisition Investigation
After it was publicly announced that a mall was to be acquired by a city and turned into a library, solvents were discovered on the mall property as a result of previous dry cleaning operations. McRoberts & Roberts was hired by the owner to save the sale, clean up the release, and proceed with the announced opening date ten months later. McRoberts & Roberts contracted for emergency investigation and delineation of the contamination. We also negotiated with regulators to assume and control cleanup; obtained a competitively bid, fixed price, pay-for-performance contract for most aspects of the remediation; obtained a pollution legal liability and cost-cap environmental insurance policy to provide protection from risks not included in the fixed price cleanup contract; and retained local counsel to prosecute a cost recovery action against the dry cleaning chain.
As a result of our efforts, the property was sold and the library opened as scheduled. The cleanup of solvent contamination is nearing completion.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |